|
Iamblichus, also known as Iamblichus Chalcidensis, or Iamblichus of Apamea (, probably from Syriac or Aramaic ''ya-mlku'', "He is king"; c. 245 – c. 325 AD), was a Syrian〔George Sarton (1936). "The Unity and Diversity of the Mediterranean World", ''Osiris'' 2, pp. 406–463 (); Brill's New Pauly, "Iamblichus", 2.〕 Neoplatonist philosopher who determined the direction taken by later Neoplatonic philosophy. ==Iamblichus' life== Iamblichus was the chief representative of Syrian Neoplatonism,〔〔Dudley, Charles. ''Library of the World's Best Literature, Ancient and Modern'' (1899).〕 though his influence spread over much of the ancient world. The events of his life and his religious beliefs are not entirely known, but the main tenets of his beliefs can be worked out from his extant writings. According to the Suda, and his biographer Eunapius, he was born at Chalcis (modern Qinnasrin) in Syria. He was the son of a rich and illustrious family, and he is said to have been the descendant of several priest-kings of the Royal family of Emesa. He initially studied under Anatolius of Laodicea, and later went on to study under Porphyry, a pupil of Plotinus, the founder of Neoplatonism. He disagreed with Porphyry over the practice of theurgy; Iamblichus responds to Porphyry's criticisms of theurgy in a book attributed to him, ''De Mysteriis Aegyptiorum'' (''On the Egyptian Mysteries''). Around 304, he returned to Syria to found his own school at Apameia (near Antioch), a city famous for its Neoplatonic philosophers. Here he designed a curriculum for studying Plato and Aristotle, and he wrote grand commentaries on the two that survive only in fragments. Still, for Iamblichus, Pythagoras was the supreme authority. He is known to have written the ''Collection of Pythagorean Doctrines'', which, in ten books, comprised extracts from several ancient philosophers. Only the first four books, and fragments of the fifth, survive. Scholar's noted that the ''Exhortation to Philosophy of Iamblichus'', was composed in ''Apamea'' in the early 4th c. AD.〔(【引用サイトリンク】title=Introduction to Iamblichus' Exhortation to Philosophy (upcoming talk) )〕 Iamblichus was said to have been a man of great culture and learning. He was also renowned for his charity and self-denial. Many students gathered around him, and he lived with them in genial friendship. According to Fabricius, he died during the reign of Constantine, sometime before 333. Only a fraction of Iamblichus' books have survived. For our knowledge of his system, we are indebted partly to the fragments of writings preserved by Stobaeus and others. The notes of his successors, especially Proclus, as well as his five extant books and the sections of his great work on Pythagorean philosophy also reveal much of Iamblichus' system. Besides these, Proclus seems to have ascribed to him the authorship of the celebrated treatise ''Theurgia'', or ''On the Egyptian Mysteries''. However, the differences between this book and Iamblichus' other works in style and in some points of doctrine have led some to question whether Iamblichus was the actual author. Still, the treatise certainly originated from his school, and in its systematic attempt to give a speculative justification of the polytheistic cult practices of the day, it marks a turning-point in the history of thought where Iamblichus stood. As a speculative theory, Neoplatonism had received its highest development from Plotinus. The modifications introduced by lamblichus were the detailed elaboration of its formal divisions, the more systematic application of the Pythagorean number-symbolism, and, under the influence of Oriental systems, a thoroughly mythical interpretation of what Neoplatonism had formerly regarded as notional. Unlike Plotinus who broke from Platonic tradition and asserted an undescended soul, Iamblichus re-affirmed the soul's embodiment in matter believing matter to be as divine as the rest of the cosmos.〔Shaw, Gregory, ‘Neoplatonism I: Antiquity’, in Dictionary of Gnosis & Western Esotericism, ed. by Wouter J. Hanegraff (Leiden & Boston: Brill, 2006), pp. 834-835〕 It is most likely on this account that lamblichus was venerated. Iamblichus was highly praised by those who followed his thought. By his contemporaries, Iamblichus was accredited with miraculous powers. The Roman emperor Julian, not content with Eunapius' more modest eulogy that he was inferior to Porphyry only in style, regarded Iamblichus as more than second to Plato, and claimed he would give all the gold of Lydia for one epistle of Iamblichus. During the revival of interest in his philosophy in the 15th and 16th centuries, the name of Iamblichus was scarcely mentioned without the epithet "divine" or "most divine". 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Iamblichus」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|